Ethics of leverages used in common grounds for critical infrastructure. Is a leverage ever ethical, when every leverage has occured to balance an economy for a bridge in what was needed, to then settle the anguish and trauma of the past. Now we have access to what we need in the majority yet cannot settle only expand and construct to control as a scheme?
Supposed to be about instructing when possible, teaching if one can. Nurturing through correcting temperatures and ointments to contain pathogens to resolve why people who had scarlet fever had to be gased instead of healed. To then corrupt health products for a specific “cauldron” and a powerplay to further confuse away from that common aim.
Maybe a leverage shall never be ethical. Define start, the many leverages on the stockmarket today. The korean escher, the waltz in limbo, the boxer, the parasite research centre of anything “tropical” that needs something topical, where the Uue is seeping from? How many rats at the sacred temple in Bharat are a byproduct of Gujarat labs? How much of NSW paradox was spread and used as a commons to begin with?
What regions are urban designed to expose and repeat a play into an atomic design to repeat the same original anguish?
Maybe consider the arguments that first occured around a few words of the Websters ingenuity of collation.
Maybe the mutual decision after an argument over detonation and philosophy, that the word leverage was necessary. Balance was required that may have then followed with a focus on every version of the word in that same dictionary up until liberty, made a statue to try forget and continued onto lapping.
Maybe you didn’t need an oracle and endless oranges just an oriel?
Redb 