The economic morals of a nation state directly correlate to the governance, and the flow of people. The need for control of an external force in some parts of the world serves multiple purposes, prevents an excess of migration at times away from internal corruption. The lack of Wagner presence in Tunisia and the huge migration into Italy for instance. Therefore, any global power that helps control the world through peacekeeping efforts is also respected for their input, as they are in a way assisting in stabilising the world. The aim of peacekeeping is to educate for there to be no presence of an external force, however it comes back to the governing body for that to be possible. When the line is crossed into utilising peacekeeping troops for war, the lines are blurred. When internal figureheads within such military structures see the power, they themselves have, then they need to be dealt with accordingly. Control exists merely to stabilise, not to mitigate the freedom of cultural expression itself.
Financial systems and creating a means to control not through military efforts, but the input of new economies must also be seen with caution as to how these economic systems way hinder cultural freedom and the uniqueness of a society and how it functions.
The thing with the human experience and creating the ideal urban form for growth is that we could correlate the spatial factor of how palatable a life is directly to how many people exist per m2 of space. However, the resources in that m2 or the proximity of resources to the occupied m2 largely depend on the experience of said human, the cultural of cohabitation and the level of reason. Reason to see the impact of humans overtaking natural spaces and the potential for the spread of disease, ecosystem degradation because of this.
It is a natural human reaction when faced with extinction is to breed, or fear of extinction that humans uneducated with the resource demand of their existence will continue to breed in a conscious manner not a reasonable one. Without educational support, societies will always come back to conflict. As that is the only power they have.
When humans on the microscale are left to endure and suffer the metaphysical energy of pain and resentment that is stored and not transmuted into something constructive then chaos is inevitable. Continued chaos that may spread, and in that process, what is human is lost. The human animal, the drive to survive without morals may continue. Without a means to incorporate the many global learnings of humanity through history, science, engineering, and literature. The philosophy of theology of how to co-exist humbly with respect to different heritage and faith so co-learning between faiths can occur.
The human animal also exists in the space to over control, the space of over capitalisation. The human ghost exists at the end of each spectrum, chaos, and the different modes of control through political thought.
There are areas of the world that will remain in turmoil, maybe that is how they want to remain. Pain begets pain and trauma, for once a level of order is established. There is the capacity for over order. For an imprisonment of persons and humanhood through systems. The metaphysical imprisonment of humans in chaos is the short-term thinking and limitation of action through simply living to survive.
With enough order there is the capacity for the essence of what is human to remain, balanced through the order of infrastructure and well allocated resources. Ethics and morals and values that are tied to the land we need to survive, the resources that are also a part of the earth. The issue with the mythic consciousness we have developed as a species is to think that some divinity in terms of a one true god will ensure humanity prevails. When it is the god within each human, that enables a means to forgive so there can be reiterative collaboration, and a little reasonable devil within for competition that enables sustainable procession to occur so we can aim for utopian spaces.
The ethics of big data concern me, because how data can be used in systems of over control, and what of humanity might be lost in that process. As then we essentially creating a world where anarchy is more appealing. Knowledge is a power but also a burden. Pertaining to our knowledge around water at the microscale, how to maintain potable water with the complexities of modern pollutants keeps us on our tails. There is a lot to be improved in the world of water filtration, but the technology is there, as it is for energy and waste management in a different way. However, the skewed economies of the world create an inherent disadvantage for the equitable allocation of sustainable technologies, and the education around what sustainable technologies are. In some instances, it takes a war, unforgivable violence for a new perspective to be seen or considered. There are always international strategies at play.
Global media and how is fuels religious difference when war occurs, and how war exists as well in media to distract from internal politics of any said nation.
We are still trying to empower the femme, the female intelligence of the world. Yet the challenges around sustainable economies remain. Especially pertaining to water supply and fair water sharing systems in stressed regions of the world. Lack of this human right as a call for violence remains to be strong and ever present.
The debt to international banks and other nations each nation state holds as a weight on their heads, however that weight, that pressure of debt that drives a different progression of sorts. The issue becomes around the economies created for progression; one could argue the nations with more debt start to objectify the female form as an economy. Other nations the weapon industry. And media will always use religion and cultural difference/ ethnicity as the topic for conversations around war, yet water and water sharing, and difference in education is likely always the root of the issue. As when human biases align, they themselves align and naturally share in micro-economies with those who are familiar, and familiarity always likes in obvious likeness. Which is always a re-occurring issue in history but also how subcultures form in a way.
It takes a combination of different political and religious philosophy to create the ideal social order for an equitable society, yet there is always going to be a push and a pull between ideals and dynamics which do in fact at times fall back on the polars of cultural bias itself.
Redb 